This is a copy of something I posted in the Overwatch Feedback Forum regarding the late-2017 changes to the healing character Mercy.

I am wondering if maybe the Mercy change and this nerf are both... well, it's difficult to explain. I understand why the nerf, but I don't understand why the original Mercy change, since that flies in the face of both good game design and good strategy.

This is a copy of something I posted in the Overwatch Feedback Forum regarding the late-2017 changes to the healing character Mercy.

Caveats in advance: I prefer old Mercy, am used to current Mercy, and what I am going to suggest is something nobody wants, which is yet another massive overhaul to Mercy. I would also accept old Mercy again.

The Reasoning:

Overwatch Free-for-all deathmatch has opened my eyes a bit to something which might actually drive me away from Overwatch in the end. It may not really be their fault; I am willing to give them the benefit of the doubt, and certainly they have been trying to make the best game possible. But playing Overwatch for the first time without any semblance of being on a team made me realize just how lonely I feel playing Overwatch in general.

Having listened for some time to tech commentators talk about the potential of augmented reality glasses (commonly known by the acronym AR), I'd like to offer a deceptively simple litmus test to help us determine when that technology has finally arrived. Because, spoiler alert, I don't believe that what we have *is* AR; it's simply a heads-up display or a head-mounted display that shows content that we already have. For real augmented reality, you must generate a new reality based on the real world around you.

I think it's pretty consistent in my mind that the single greatest cause of my life's problems is not knowing where I belong. And now, having spent my earnings for the last few months on a 3D printer and some Arduinos, it kind of crystalizes a thought in my head: if I had had these resources twenty years ago, today I might be a human being instead of a walking disappointment.

This is just how my life is: I write novels in my mind in my spare time, but I just can't write them down without help, so they are always lost. The way my life is, these things never get told, because I need help, and no matter what help I need, I can be assured I won't get it. But I might as well write *about* it, when I can do nothing to actually *write* it.

In thinking about Rogue Academy I am reminded of another style of game, where you must navigate a predetermined timeline full of trouble, in part by going (in character) into the past, and in part by (out of character) reloading an earlier save. Thinking about that got me interested, in particular, in how to *present* a game like that, especially if, as with RA, the game is about getting one or more desired endings out of a complicated, randomly generated timeline.

1. The premise

This is a list of podcasts I'm currently following, and possibly a few I have previously followed but do not any more. Anything on this list is a personal recommendation, for one reason or another.

With the release of Starbound 1.0, I am not¹ upset but neither impressed with the game. As I had kind of expected, the writing is a little poor, but they were trying to find a mechanical premise for advancement that fit into the game, and that is hard. So instead of rambling on about their past choices, here is a sequel concept.

1. Game theme: Colonization, Industrialization, BBEGs, and Intergalactic Politics

So I have come to play and to love Factorio, a smallish game about automation, creation, and some amount of defense against alien hordes. I have to emphasize the "smallish" part; I haven't finished it, but I have a hard time envisioning the latter portions of the game as engaging me quite as much as the development challenges in the early game. As I can never really step out of my armchair game designer shoes, I wondered to myself: what would I do if I were in charge of a sequel?